Skip to content

Binance.US CEO Slams SEC’s Approach

    Norman Reed, Interim CEO of Binance.US, has launched a
    scathing critique of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) strategy
    for regulating digital assets, characterizing it as fundamentally flawed and
    harmful to the US economy. Reed, a former SEC employee, has articulated his
    concerns in a strongly worded op-ed for Fortune, pointing out the agency’s
    departure from core principles such as transparency, fairness, and stable
    regulation in its management of the rapidly evolving digital asset landscape.

    In his editorial, Reed emphasizes the crucial role of
    regulatory frameworks in maintaining a healthy financial ecosystem and
    protecting the interests of investors. Drawing on his background as a former
    SEC employee, Reed expresses disappointment over what he perceives as a
    deviation from the agency’s founding principles.

    Norman Reed, Interim CEO of Binance.US, Source: LinkedIn

    “The SEC was founded on principles of transparency,
    fairness, full disclosure, and stable regulation,” Reed notes in his
    op-ed. “Yet with regard to digital assets, the SEC has lost its way.”

    Reed further contends that the SEC’s current approach
    involves a jurisdictional overreach regarding digital assets, lacking proper
    authorization from Congress or the courts. He accuses the SEC of opting for
    one-off enforcement cases instead of engaging in collaborative efforts with
    legislators and other regulatory bodies to establish a comprehensive and
    well-informed regulatory framework.

    The Interim CEO’s critique comes at a time when internal
    dissent within the SEC has also been highlighted, with Commissioner Elad
    Roisman expressing concern over the lack of clarity surrounding the application
    of securities laws to digital assets. Reed underscores these internal
    disagreements as indicative of the broader challenges and uncertainties within
    the regulatory landscape.

    Executive Branch’s Silence on Digital Asset Definition
    Amplifies Uncertainty

    Members of the House Financial Services Committee have
    joined the ranks of critics, echoing concerns that the SEC’s current approach
    leaves the digital asset industry “without clear rules of the road.”
    Reed points out that the executive branch has yet to provide a clear definition
    for digital assets, while other regulators
    characterize them differently from securities.

    Reed concludes his op-ed by advocating for three remedies
    for the SEC: providing
    fair notice to the industry, abandoning arbitrary efforts against crypto, and
    collaborating with Congress to design a comprehensive and effective regulatory
    framework for the digital
    asset
    industry.

    Norman Reed, Interim CEO of Binance.US, has launched a
    scathing critique of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) strategy
    for regulating digital assets, characterizing it as fundamentally flawed and
    harmful to the US economy. Reed, a former SEC employee, has articulated his
    concerns in a strongly worded op-ed for Fortune, pointing out the agency’s
    departure from core principles such as transparency, fairness, and stable
    regulation in its management of the rapidly evolving digital asset landscape.

    In his editorial, Reed emphasizes the crucial role of
    regulatory frameworks in maintaining a healthy financial ecosystem and
    protecting the interests of investors. Drawing on his background as a former
    SEC employee, Reed expresses disappointment over what he perceives as a
    deviation from the agency’s founding principles.

    Norman Reed, Interim CEO of Binance.US, Source: LinkedIn

    “The SEC was founded on principles of transparency,
    fairness, full disclosure, and stable regulation,” Reed notes in his
    op-ed. “Yet with regard to digital assets, the SEC has lost its way.”

    Reed further contends that the SEC’s current approach
    involves a jurisdictional overreach regarding digital assets, lacking proper
    authorization from Congress or the courts. He accuses the SEC of opting for
    one-off enforcement cases instead of engaging in collaborative efforts with
    legislators and other regulatory bodies to establish a comprehensive and
    well-informed regulatory framework.

    The Interim CEO’s critique comes at a time when internal
    dissent within the SEC has also been highlighted, with Commissioner Elad
    Roisman expressing concern over the lack of clarity surrounding the application
    of securities laws to digital assets. Reed underscores these internal
    disagreements as indicative of the broader challenges and uncertainties within
    the regulatory landscape.

    Executive Branch’s Silence on Digital Asset Definition
    Amplifies Uncertainty

    Members of the House Financial Services Committee have
    joined the ranks of critics, echoing concerns that the SEC’s current approach
    leaves the digital asset industry “without clear rules of the road.”
    Reed points out that the executive branch has yet to provide a clear definition
    for digital assets, while other regulators
    characterize them differently from securities.

    Reed concludes his op-ed by advocating for three remedies
    for the SEC: providing
    fair notice to the industry, abandoning arbitrary efforts against crypto, and
    collaborating with Congress to design a comprehensive and effective regulatory
    framework for the digital
    asset
    industry.



    https://www.financemagnates.com//cryptocurrency/binanceus-ceo-slams-secs-approach-to-digital-asset-regulation-in-op-ed/”>

    #Binance.US #CEO #Slams #SECs #Approach